Template:Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

Tweaks, Cambs Dict definitions
m (Text replacement - "ReadOnly" to "Read-only")
(Tweaks, Cambs Dict definitions)
Line 1: Line 1:
----
----
[[File:Wikipedia.png|thumb|left|135px|An earlier version of the generic [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] 'globe'|alt=]]
[[File:Wikipedia.png|thumb|left|135px|An earlier version of the generic [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] 'globe'|alt=]]
'''Wikipedia – ''The Free Encyclopedia''''' — is 'the free wiki [[:Category:Encyclopedia|encyclopedia]] that [[:Category:OpenEdit|anyone can edit]]'.
<big>'''Wikipedia – ''The Free Encyclopedia''''' — is 'the free wiki [[:Category:Encyclopedia|encyclopedia]] that [[:Category:OpenEdit|anyone can edit]]'.</big>


The brainchild of [[:Category:American|American]] internet entrepreneur [[Jimmy Wales]], among others, and the original '{{WMF.org|Our projects|project}}' of the subsequent {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF), [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] stated {{Cambridge-Dictionary|objective}} is to have an officially '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view}}' ([[:Category:NPOV|NPOV]]).  Sadly, <u>many</u> articles suffer from {{Cambridge-Dictionary|systemic}} bias; Wikipedia is often justifiably {{Wp|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|accused}} by people on one side of an issue of being biased toward the other side, and vice-versa.  This is true across the political spectrum, as well as for many other issues and [[:Category:Wiki Topic|subjects]] covered.  Wikipedia is the biggest fish in the global [[:Category:All|wiki]] pond, and receives far more traffic, ''and'' [[:Category:Wiki Edit Mode|editing]] activity, than any other [[WhatIsWiki|wiki site]].  However, despite Wikipedias' claim to being an '{{Cambridge-Dictionary|encyclopedia}}', many [[:Category:Education|academic]] institutes and other [[:Category:Professions|professional]] organisations recommend that Wikipedia is <u>not</u> used as a primary source of information, due to the fact that many articles are frequently incorrect, and can be routinely adversely biased.  Furthermore, many Wikipedia articles have a seemingly extremely low threshold of '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source}}' references and {{Wp|Wikipedia:Citing sources|citations}}.  Indeed, <u>many</u> Wikipedia articles fail their own {{Wp|Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability}} criteria, and can remain for many years without any citations, despite highly visible warning banners highlighting the lack of said citations (and threatening to delete said unreferenced articles); this even includes biographical articles for {{Wp|Category:Living people|living people}}.  Also, the [[English Wikipedia]] allows articles to be 'promoted' to a {{Wp|Wikipedia:Good articles|good article}} (GA) status; despite failing their own {{Wp|Wikipedia:Good article criteria|criteria}} on having adequate reliable source citations, editorial {{Cambridge-Dictionary|conjecture}}, and even {{Wp|Wikipedia:No original research|original research}}. [https://web.archive.org/web/20160205045501/http://Eng.Anarchopedia.org/Criticism_of_Wikipedia]
The brainchild of [[:Category:American|American]] internet entrepreneur [[Jimmy Wales]], among others, and the original '{{WMF.org|Our projects|project}}' of the subsequent {{tag|Wikimedia Foundation}} (WMF), [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] stated {{Cambridge-Dictionary|objective}} is to have an officially '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view}}' ([[:Category:NPOV|NPOV]]) of its content.  Sadly, <u>many</u> articles suffer from {{Cambridge-Dictionary|systemic}} bias; Wikipedia is often justifiably {{Wp|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|accused}} by people on one side of an issue of being {{Cambridge-Dictionary|biased}} toward the other side, and {{Cambridge-Dictionary|vice-versa|vice versa}}.  This is true across political {{Cambridge-Dictionary|spectrum}}s, as well as for many other issues and [[:Category:Wiki Topic|subjects]] covered.  Wikipedia is the biggest fish in the global [[:Category:All|wiki]] pond, and receives far more traffic, ''and'' [[:Category:Wiki Edit Mode|editing]] activity, than any other [[WhatIsWiki|wiki site]].  However, despite Wikipedias' claim to being an '{{Cambridge-Dictionary|encyclopedia}}', many [[:Category:Education|academic]] institutes and other [[:Category:Professions|professional]] organisations recommend that Wikipedia is <u>not</u> used as a {{Cambridge-Dictionary|primary-source|primary source}} of information, due to the fact that many articles are frequently incorrect, and can be routinely {{Cambridge-Dictionary|adverse}}ly biased.  Furthermore, many Wikipedia articles have a seemingly extremely low threshold of '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source}}' references and {{Wp|Wikipedia:Citing sources|citations}}.  Indeed, <u>many</u> Wikipedia articles fail their own {{Wp|Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability}} criteria, and can remain for many years without any {{Cambridge-Dictionary|citation}}s, despite highly visible warning banners highlighting the lack of said citations (and threatening to delete said unreferenced articles); this even includes {{Cambridge-Dictionary|biographical}} articles for {{Wp|Category:Living people|living people}}.  Also, the [[English Wikipedia]] allows articles to be 'promoted' to a {{Wp|Wikipedia:Good articles|good article}} (GA) status; despite failing their own {{Wp|Wikipedia:Good article criteria|criteria}} on having adequate {{Cambridge-Dictionary|reliable}} {{Cambridge-Dictionary|source}} citations, editorial {{Cambridge-Dictionary|conjecture}}, and even {{Wp|Wikipedia:No original research|original research}}. [https://web.archive.org/web/20160205045501/http://Eng.Anarchopedia.org/Criticism_of_Wikipedia]


When launched in [[:Category:Founded in 2001|2001]], Wikipedia was initially powered by [[:Category:UseMod Wiki|UseMod Wiki]], a wiki engine software package developed by [[Clifford Adams]] used to {{Cambridge-Dictionary|moderate#verb|moderate}} (''verb'') the quality of posts on [[:Category:Usenet|Usenet]].  Wikipedia used this UseMod Wiki software during its first year of 2001, until 25 January [[:Category:Founded in 2002|2002]], when it started to use the '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Phase II software|Phase II software}}' as developed by [[Magnus Manske]].  On 20 July 2002, 'Phase III software' (a complete rewrite of Manskes' Phase II by [[Lee Daniel Crocker]]) was released and used on the [[English Wikipedia]], and at the same time, was renamed [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]]. [http://usemod.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Comparison_Of_Usemod_With_Mediawiki]  The MediaWiki [[:Category:Wiki engine|wiki engine]] has subsequently been extensively developed and expanded, through continued collaborative {{Cambridge-Dictionary|evolution}}s.  As well as being used all 900-or-so wiki sites of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), MediaWiki is also used by many thousands of other [[:Category:Independent|independently]]-hosted wiki sites, and many [[:Category:Free MediaWiki wiki farm|free]] and commercial [[:Category:MediaWiki wiki farm|wiki farms]].
When launched in [[:Category:Founded in 2001|2001]], Wikipedia was initially powered by [[:Category:UseMod Wiki|UseMod Wiki]], a wiki engine software package developed by [[Clifford Adams]] used to {{Cambridge-Dictionary|moderate#verb|moderate}} (''verb'') the quality of posts on [[:Category:Usenet|Usenet]] groups.  Wikipedia used this UseMod Wiki software during its first year of 2001, until 25 January [[:Category:Founded in 2002|2002]], when it started to use the '{{Wp|Wikipedia:Phase II software|Phase II software}}' as developed by [[Magnus Manske]].  On 20 July 2002, 'Phase III software' (a complete {{Cambridge-Dictionary|rewrite}} of Manskes' Phase II by [[Lee Daniel Crocker]]) was released and used on the [[English Wikipedia]], and at the same time, was renamed [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]]. [http://usemod.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Comparison_Of_Usemod_With_Mediawiki]  The MediaWiki [[:Category:Wiki engine|wiki engine]] has subsequently been {{Cambridge-Dictionary|extensively}} developed and {{Cambridge-Dictionary|expand}}ed, through continued collaborative {{Cambridge-Dictionary|evolution}}s.  As well as being used all 900-or-so wiki sites of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), MediaWiki is also used by many thousands of other [[:Category:Independent|independently]]-hosted wiki sites, and many [[:Category:Free MediaWiki wiki farm|free]] and commercial [[:Category:MediaWiki wiki farm|wiki farms]].


In respect of content [[:Category:Wiki license|licensing]], historically, when Wikipedia was founded in 2001, it released all textual [[wiki]] content under the 'copyleft' [[:Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]] (GNU Free Doc License, or GFDL).  However, during [[:Category:Founded in 2009|2009]], all existing Wikipedia wiki sites migrated to a new license: the [[:Category:Wiki Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 unported license]] (CC-BY-SA 3.0); and all content published until that migration date could be retro-released under either or [[:Category:Wiki Multi-license|both licenses]].  All content published ''after'' the migration date is released under only the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, as are any newly created Wikipedia language version wiki sites. [https://news.slashdot.org/story/09/05/21/2317253/wikipedia-moving-from-gfdl-to-creative-commons-license]
In respect of content [[:Category:Wiki license|licensing]], historically, when Wikipedia was founded in 2001, it released all textual [[wiki]] content under the 'copyleft' [[:Category:Wiki GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]] (GNU Free Doc License, or GFDL).  However, during [[:Category:Founded in 2009|2009]], all existing Wikipedia wiki sites {{Cambridge-Dictionary|migrate}}d to a new license: the [[:Category:Wiki Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 unported license]] (CC-BY-SA 3.0); and all content published until that migration date could be {{Cambridge-Dictionary|retrospectively}} released under either ''or'' [[:Category:Wiki Multi-license|both licenses]].  All content published ''after'' the migration date is released under only the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, as are any newly created Wikipedia language version wiki sites. [https://news.slashdot.org/story/09/05/21/2317253/wikipedia-moving-from-gfdl-to-creative-commons-license]
*[https://www.wikipedia.org www.Wikipedia.org] — Wikipedia [[:Category:Portal|portal]] to all language versions
*[https://www.wikipedia.org www.Wikipedia.org] — Wikipedia [[:Category:Portal|portal]] to all language versions
*{{WMF-Meta|Wikipedia}} — Meta.Wikimedia.org at [[Wikimedia Meta-Wiki]]
*{{WMF-Meta|Wikipedia}} — Meta.Wikimedia.org at [[Wikimedia Meta-Wiki]]
Line 62: Line 62:
*Roth, Camille (October 2007); [https://www.academia.edu/2734893/Viable_wikis_struggle_for_life_in_the_wikisphere  Viable wikis: struggle for life in the wikisphere]; ''www.Academia.edu''; CRESS / Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, [[:Category:United Kingdom|UK]].
*Roth, Camille (October 2007); [https://www.academia.edu/2734893/Viable_wikis_struggle_for_life_in_the_wikisphere  Viable wikis: struggle for life in the wikisphere]; ''www.Academia.edu''; CRESS / Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, [[:Category:United Kingdom|UK]].
*Lovink, Geert; Tkacz, Nathaniel (eds) (2011); [https://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-a-wikipedia-reader/ Critical point of view: a Wikpedia reader]; ''NetworkCultures.org''; Institute of Network Cultures; [[:Category:Amsterdam|Amsterdam]], The Netherlands; ISBN 978-90-78146-13-1; paperback; 385 pages.
*Lovink, Geert; Tkacz, Nathaniel (eds) (2011); [https://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-a-wikipedia-reader/ Critical point of view: a Wikpedia reader]; ''NetworkCultures.org''; Institute of Network Cultures; [[:Category:Amsterdam|Amsterdam]], The Netherlands; ISBN 978-90-78146-13-1; paperback; 385 pages.
*Chen, Adrian (August 2011); [https://www.gawker.com/5827835/wikipedia-is-slowly-dying Wikipedia is slowly dying]; ''www.Gawker.com''; BDG Media Inc.; 315 Park Ave S, 11th Floor New York, [[:Category:New York State|NY]] 10010, USA.
*Chen, Adrian (August 2011); [https://www.gawker.com/5827835/wikipedia-is-slowly-dying Wikipedia is slowly dying]; ''www.Gawker.com''; BDG Media Inc.; 315 Park Ave S, 11th Floor, [[:Category:New York City|New York]], [[:Category:New York State|NY]] 10010, USA.
*Bourdeloie, Hélène; Vicente, Michaël (2014); [https://www.academia.edu/37661498/Bourdeloie_H_et_Vicente_M_2014_Contributing_to_Wikipedia_A_Question_of_Gender_in_Fichman_P_et_Hara_N_dir_Global_Wikipedia_International_and_cross_cultural_issues_in_online_collaboration_Lanham_Rowman_and_Littlefield_p_147_160 Contributing to Wikipedia: a question of gender]; ''www.Academia.edu''; Global Wikipedia : International and cross-cultural issues in online collaboration; Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; pp. 147-160.
*Bourdeloie, Hélène; Vicente, Michaël (2014); [https://www.academia.edu/37661498/Bourdeloie_H_et_Vicente_M_2014_Contributing_to_Wikipedia_A_Question_of_Gender_in_Fichman_P_et_Hara_N_dir_Global_Wikipedia_International_and_cross_cultural_issues_in_online_collaboration_Lanham_Rowman_and_Littlefield_p_147_160 Contributing to Wikipedia: a question of gender]; ''www.Academia.edu''; Global Wikipedia : International and cross-cultural issues in online collaboration; Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; pp. 147-160.
*Safner, Ryan (February 2015); [https://www.academia.edu/10743010/Wiki_nomics_Bringing_Institutions_Back_into_the_Analysis_of_Copyright_with_a_Case_Study_of_Wikipedia Wiki-nomics: bringing institutions back into the analysis of copyright with a case study of Wikipedia]; ''www.Academia.edu''; George Mason University, Fairfax, [[:Category:Virginia|Virginia]], USA.
*Safner, Ryan (February 2015); [https://www.academia.edu/10743010/Wiki_nomics_Bringing_Institutions_Back_into_the_Analysis_of_Copyright_with_a_Case_Study_of_Wikipedia Wiki-nomics: bringing institutions back into the analysis of copyright with a case study of Wikipedia]; ''www.Academia.edu''; George Mason University, Fairfax, [[:Category:Virginia|Virginia]], USA.