Template talk:Language: Difference between revisions

Look at these subpages
No edit summary
(Look at these subpages)
Line 4: Line 4:
::: I mean both, cats for language and subcats for language level, double categorization. --[[User:213.23.174.67|213.23.174.67]] 06:41, 2 March 2007 (PST)
::: I mean both, cats for language and subcats for language level, double categorization. --[[User:213.23.174.67|213.23.174.67]] 06:41, 2 March 2007 (PST)
:::: Mission failed &ndash; [[Smiddle]]/<small>[[Talk:Smiddle|T]][[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|C]]</small> 06:52, 2 March 2007 (PST)
:::: Mission failed &ndash; [[Smiddle]]/<small>[[Talk:Smiddle|T]][[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|C]]</small> 06:52, 2 March 2007 (PST)
== Look at these subpages ==
The following links lead to the subpages of [[Template:Language]], the link captions are combined of level names an language names, i have made a demo-Template (the second parameter is english defaulted). The mechanics are similar.
*{{Langdemo|0}}
*{{Langdemo|1}}
*{{Langdemo|2}}
*{{Langdemo|3}}
*{{Langdemo|4}}
*{{Langdemo|5}}
*{{Langdemo|N}}
or
*{{Langdemo|0|GermanSpeakers}}
*{{Langdemo|2|}}
Would you integrate the idea into the original main template?
The language categorization schema would be as follows:
*EnglishSpeakers
** BasicEnglishSpeakers
** NativeEnglishSpeakers
** NonEnglishSpeakers
** ...
*ItalianSpeakers
** BasicItalianSpeakers
** NativeItalianSpeakers
** NonItalianSpeakers
** ...
*''Language''+Speaker
**''Level''+''Language''+Speaker
What do you think? Best regards, --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 08:19, 3 March 2007 (PST)
4,624

edits