975
edits
User talk:ChristopheDucamp: Difference between revisions
→Inactive: inactive template much more simpler... will follow-up later.
(→Inactive: inactive template much more simpler... will follow-up later.) |
|||
| Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
The reason I'm using the template this way is because we will later have the option to change the template to make a global change. Or do you have a reason that I'm not aware of? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 23:07, 15 Feb 2006 (EST) | The reason I'm using the template this way is because we will later have the option to change the template to make a global change. Or do you have a reason that I'm not aware of? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 23:07, 15 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
Hi raymon. no reason at all to use the old template. I did not invent the previous one (this wiki-syntax if still too much complicated imho...). Just tested the new inactive template on [[ZaurusWiki]] to achieve Z inactive letter. Nice. Will follow-up soon to review Y,X,W and so on. Thanks for your new suggestion. Seems much more simple to use. I have to work now :-( [[Christophe Ducamp]] | <small>[[User talk:ChristopheDucamp|talk]]</small> 05:50, 16 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||