Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
Removing external links - only one was to Conservapedia, which is redundant as it's in the info box
(Not really 'criticisms', more general information connected with Conservapedia) |
(Removing external links - only one was to Conservapedia, which is redundant as it's in the info box) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Criticisms== | ==Criticisms== | ||
The Young Earth Creationist position of Conservapedia is considered unscientific. Articles about Political Liberals are considered defamatory. The site is considered unobjective generally. Conservapedia is accused of being basically Andrew Schlafly's blog. The site is partly aimed at homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. Such children are unlikely to see where Conservapedia is considered out of touch with reality. Conservapedia is also aimed at adult American fundamentalist Christians who are discouraged from getting information outside their narrow Christian viewpoint and may not see any problems with Conservapedia. | The Young Earth Creationist position of Conservapedia is considered unscientific. Articles about Political Liberals are considered defamatory. The site is considered unobjective generally. Conservapedia is accused of being basically Andrew Schlafly's blog. The site is partly aimed at homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. Such children are unlikely to see where Conservapedia is considered out of touch with reality. Conservapedia is also aimed at adult American fundamentalist Christians who are discouraged from getting information outside their narrow Christian viewpoint and may not see any problems with Conservapedia. | ||
[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]] | [[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]] | ||
[[Category:FoundedIn2007]] | [[Category:FoundedIn2007]] |