Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

112 bytes added ,  31 July 2008
no edit summary
(Removing external links - only one was to Conservapedia, which is redundant as it's in the info box)
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:


==Criticisms==
==Criticisms==
The Young Earth Creationist position of Conservapedia is considered unscientific.  Articles about Political Liberals are considered defamatory.  The site is considered unobjective generally. Conservapedia is accused of being basically Andrew Schlafly's blog.  The site is partly aimed at homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. Such children  are unlikely to see where Conservapedia is considered out of touch with reality. Conservapedia is also aimed at adult American fundamentalist Christians who are discouraged from getting information outside their narrow Christian viewpoint and may not see any problems with Conservapedia.
The Young Earth Creationist position of Conservapedia is considered unscientific.  Articles about Political Liberals are considered defamatory.  The site is considered unobjective generally. Conservapedia is accused of being basically Andrew Schlafly's blog.  The site is partly aimed at homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes who are unlikely to see where Conservapedia is considered out of touch with reality. Conservapedia is also aimed at adult American fundamentalist Christians who are discouraged from getting information outside their narrow Christian viewpoint and may not see any problems with Conservapedia. Conservapedia is further accused of blocking users over minor disagreements. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia]
 


[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]]
[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]]
[[Category:FoundedIn2007]]
[[Category:FoundedIn2007]]
1,853

edits