RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

415 bytes removed ,  31 July 2008
Removing information of dubious accuracy
(Removing information of dubious accuracy)
Line 25: Line 25:
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote>   
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote>   
==Criticism==
==Criticism==
Many of the members, especially admins admit to having been vandals at many different wikis including [[Conservapedia]]. They have attacked Conservapedia in the following manners
Many of the members admit to having been vandals at different wikis including [[Conservapedia]] and RationalWiki itself. The admins, by and large, don't have a problem with this, as long as they find the vandalism (or 'wandalism', as they refer to it) funny. This can lead to a somewhat anarchic feel to the wiki, even though it is called 'RationalWiki'.
 
*Fighting and picking fights;
*Trying to remove content;
*Blanking pages, including pages of admins;
*Using foul language against other editors;
*Showing outright contempt for the site, conservatism in general, Christianity, and family values;
*The insertion of objectionable content, such as porn images and links to porn sites;
*Lying, by either including deliberately false article content, or lying in their own conduct;
*Vandalism and cyber-terrorist tactics.
*Many of the users hold Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc.


==See also==
==See also==
Anonymous user