1,853
edits
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Missed a couple) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned for trying to counteract the overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political bias, largely by debating the issues on talk-pages. Althought the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. Most articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, many editors are practicing Christans or Jews, tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. | RationalWiki wi a wiki which supports scientific investigation and the scientific method against blind dogma. | ||
==History== | |||
RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned for trying to counteract the overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political bias, largely by debating the issues on talk-pages. Althought the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. | |||
==Rationalwiki today== | |||
Most articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, many editors are practicing Christans or Jews, tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. | |||
The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others. | The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
<br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:- | <br>Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:- | ||
<Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote> | <Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article]''</Blockquote> | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners: | Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. Criticism of Conservapedia on RationalWiki and elsewhere is so extreme that people who generally edit wikis responsibly may be tempted to vandalize Conservapedia. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners: | ||
*Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor); | *Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor); | ||