Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

9 bytes added ,  19 November 2008
→‎Criticisms: Really Gulik?
(→‎Criticisms: Really Gulik?)
Line 23: Line 23:
==Criticisms==
==Criticisms==
'''NOTE: THE FOLLOWING SECTION COULD NOT BE NEUTRAL, DUE TO THE FACT THIS SECTION WAS CREATED BY RATIONALWIKI STAFF. NOTE THAT NO OTHER WIKIINDEX ARTICLE HAS A CRITICISM SECTION.'''  <br/>
'''NOTE: THE FOLLOWING SECTION COULD NOT BE NEUTRAL, DUE TO THE FACT THIS SECTION WAS CREATED BY RATIONALWIKI STAFF. NOTE THAT NO OTHER WIKIINDEX ARTICLE HAS A CRITICISM SECTION.'''  <br/>
Note that no other Wiki ''needs'' one this badly.
Note that no other Wiki ''needs'' one this badly. {{Fact}}


Conservapedia is widely criticised. Liberals dislike intensely the blatant Conservative bias and outright slander against all Liberals and Moderate Conservatives in Conservapedia.  Other Conservatives fear that Conservapedia is giving their cause a bad name. What drives both insane is the fact that they can't FIX any it, due to Conservapedia's utterly dysfunctional management.  
Conservapedia is widely criticised. Liberals dislike intensely the blatant Conservative bias and outright slander against all Liberals and Moderate Conservatives in Conservapedia.  Other Conservatives fear that Conservapedia is giving their cause a bad name. What drives both insane is the fact that they can't FIX any it, due to Conservapedia's utterly dysfunctional management.  
54

edits