Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
:::::::I will start removing all the falsehoods as soon as a neutral admin (are there any? None seem to ever come around) says that this article stays. Otherwise I'd just be wasting my time. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 19:23, 20 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::I will start removing all the falsehoods as soon as a neutral admin (are there any? None seem to ever come around) says that this article stays. Otherwise I'd just be wasting my time. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 19:23, 20 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::So you blocked yourself. So you are a sysop.  OK you got that without trying. Congratulations. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 22:51, 20 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::So you blocked yourself. So you are a sysop.  OK you got that without trying. Congratulations. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 22:51, 20 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::Wait, your're telling me that you are writing the article about Conservapedia, but you don't even know enough about Conservapedia to know that block rights are given out separately from sysop? How is anybody supposed to believe that anything you write is true, when the only edits you make on Conservapedia are vandalism, and you clearly know about no other aspects of the wiki?? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 02:12, 21 November 2008 (EST)
What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST)
What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST)


Uncyclopedia has plenty of criticism of the blocking policy.  Encyclopedia Dramatica is impossible to edit because any attempt to edit triggers a spam filter. Impartial administrators need to decide what this wiki is for. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)
Uncyclopedia has plenty of criticism of the blocking policy.  Encyclopedia Dramatica is impossible to edit because any attempt to edit triggers a spam filter. Impartial administrators need to decide what this wiki is for. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)
:It's hardly a criticism. On a humorwiki you get blocked humorously and without much sense. Ooooooh that's a harsh criticism indeed. And spam filter? If that's the only reason why there's no criticism, then how did the article get there in the first place? Clearly if someone wanted to write a criticism they could get around the spam filter in the same way. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:28, 16 November 2008 (EST)
:It's hardly a criticism. On a humorwiki you get blocked humorously and without much sense. Ooooooh that's a harsh criticism indeed. And spam filter? If that's the only reason why there's no criticism, then how did the article get there in the first place? Clearly if someone wanted to write a criticism they could get around the spam filter in the same way. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:28, 16 November 2008 (EST)
54

edits