Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

749 bytes removed ,  23 November 2008
Your external links are just more attacks against Conservapedia
(→‎Criticism: this is vague, try to expand; hopefully the language is agreeable to all?)
(Your external links are just more attacks against Conservapedia)
Line 12: Line 12:
| wiki_maintopic        = Encyclopedia
| wiki_maintopic        = Encyclopedia
}}
}}
'''Conservapedia''' is an encyclopedia written with a conservative viewpoint; specifically, Conservapedia's articles are politically conservative, friendly to young Earth creationism and conservative Christianity, and USA-centric. Conservapedia is in general hostile to liberals, homosexuals, and people who support or teach the theory of evolution.  
'''Conservapedia''' is an encyclopedia written with a christian conservative viewpoint; specifically, Conservapedia's articles are politically conservative, friendly to young Earth creationism and conservative Christianity, and USA-centric. Conservapedia is in general hostile toward what they perceive as a liberal agenda to promote homosexualism and evolutionism.  


The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly and a group of homeschooled people to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, pro-Evolution, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of Wikipedia. The stated purpose of the site is to provide a family-friendly resource for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, a few more adult topics such as [http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality homosexuality] are also treated in depth.
The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly and a group of homeschooled people to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, anti-creationism, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of Wikipedia. The stated purpose of the site is to provide a family-friendly resource for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, a few more adult topics such as [http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality homosexuality] are also treated in depth.


Every edit on Conservapedia is scrutinized by the administrators for potential liberal bias.  As a result, Conservapedia cannot be edited during nighttime, U.S. time, except by users with special "night editing" rights, to prevent vandals from striking when all or most of the administrators are asleep.
Every edit on Conservapedia is scrutinized by the administrators for potential liberal bias.  As a result, Conservapedia cannot be edited during nighttime, U.S. time, except by users with special "night editing" rights, to prevent vandals from striking when all or most of the administrators are asleep.


==Criticism==
==Attacks from the left==
The website has been the subject of strong criticism by liberals, moderates, and even other conservatives for its perceived extreme viewpoints. Many users who tried to edit the site are blocked largely because they hold non-conservative views. People wanting to join and edit Conservapedia need to know that the administrators largely do not condone endless debate, and the wiki is not designed to be an avenue for people to "disprove" conservative ideals. Because of this, users should be aware that Conservapedian administrators usually have a low tolerance for trying to add what they consider "liberal bias" to articles, as well as long discussions on article talk pages. There is a debate namespace deticated towards debates, but the administrators also expect users to contribute positively to mainspace articles.
The website has been the subject of attacks by liberals and moderatesfor its particular viewpoints. Users who tried to add non-christian information are blocked. People wanting to join and edit Conservapedia need to know that the administrators largely do not condone endless debate, and the wiki is not designed to be an avenue for people to "disprove" conservative ideals. Because of this, users should be aware that Conservapedian administrators usually have a low tolerance for trying to add what they consider "liberal bias" to articles, as well as long discussions on article talk pages. There is a debate namespace dedicated towards debates, but the administrators also expect users to contribute positively to mainspace articles.


The website [[RationalWiki]] was largely set up by those expelled from Conservapedia as a "snarky" critical response to Conservapedia. Many criticisms can be found about Conservapedia on this wiki:
[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize Conservapedia and also to criticize pseudo-science in general.
*[http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia Conservapedia], RationalWiki’s Main article about Conservapedia.
*[http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/The_Conservapedia_RationalWiki_War The Conservapedia RationalWiki War], the RationalWiki interpretation of the "war" between Conservapedia and RationalWiki
*[http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Category:Conservapedia Category of articles]  RationalWiki’s  large collection of articles about Conservapedia.


==Statistics==
==Statistics==
Line 33: Line 30:


As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia had 11,005 valid registered users (not counting 11,086 blocked accounts), of which 30 (or 0.27%) are Administrators.
As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia had 11,005 valid registered users (not counting 11,086 blocked accounts), of which 30 (or 0.27%) are Administrators.
==See also==
*[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize Conservapedia and also to criticize pseudo-science in general.


[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]][[Category:FoundedIn2006]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]]
[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]][[Category:FoundedIn2006]]
50

edits