62
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Wikiindex
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
:::Andy '''is''' Conservapedia. The management there don't even pretend to be accountable to us lumpenproleteriat. He owns it, oversees it on a daily basis, and happily deletes everything on it he doesn't like. His fixations are its fixations. If you think otherwise, Jazz, you're only fooling yourself. Edit to add: Now about a section on their "management", the nigh-impossibility of any sort of appeals, and the <strike>general "Stalinist Labor Camp" vibe the place gives off to newbies</strike> arbitrary management? --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 13:54, 26 November 2008 (EST) | :::Andy '''is''' Conservapedia. The management there don't even pretend to be accountable to us lumpenproleteriat. He owns it, oversees it on a daily basis, and happily deletes everything on it he doesn't like. His fixations are its fixations. If you think otherwise, Jazz, you're only fooling yourself. Edit to add: Now about a section on their "management", the nigh-impossibility of any sort of appeals, and the <strike>general "Stalinist Labor Camp" vibe the place gives off to newbies</strike> arbitrary management? --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 13:54, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::::I think there should be a section warning potential users that they can get blocked for doing things that they don't know are wrong. I'm not sure what we can do as we agreed to accept independent arbitration. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 16:43, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ::::I think there should be a section warning potential users that they can get blocked for doing things that they don't know are wrong. I'm not sure what we can do as we agreed to accept independent arbitration. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 16:43, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::::Good idea. I've started a "Editors' Guidelines" section, which I'm sure could be expanded upon. And I stand by my misstatements. --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 16:25, 27 November 2008 (EST) | |||