41
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Sysops and blocks
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
:::::::::::I don't see why the section should not be included so long as it is accurate. Otherwise persons considering editing Conservapedia are very likely to receive a rude shock when they are blocked unexpectedly. It is a way for WikiIndex to assist its users. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 21:10, 29 November 2008 (EST) | :::::::::::I don't see why the section should not be included so long as it is accurate. Otherwise persons considering editing Conservapedia are very likely to receive a rude shock when they are blocked unexpectedly. It is a way for WikiIndex to assist its users. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 21:10, 29 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Most countries don't follow caveat emptor. Even the United States has consumer protection legislation. I think we are helping potential users by warning them about Conservapedia's blocking policy. The oponents of Conservapedia have compromised a great deal. I think this should stay. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:20, 30 November 2008 (EST) | Most countries don't follow caveat emptor. Even the United States has consumer protection legislation. I think we are helping potential users by warning them about Conservapedia's blocking policy. The oponents of Conservapedia have compromised a great deal. I think this should stay. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:20, 30 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:As long as it's done politely, I think it's appropriate. The long list of abuses (One editor did this; "nonsense" seems to mean anything factual) was fairly ridiculous. But helpful advice seems to be a good thing, and fairly "WikiWay" in that it is feedback and guidelines to help the community. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 12:17, 30 November 2008 (EST) | |||