428
edits
User talk:Peu: Difference between revisions
→Template:Size experimental
(→Template:Size experimental: +cmt) |
|||
| Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
: I would include the new parameter directly into [[template:size]], first without auto-categorizing. This can be added later. What is the highest wiki factor you've ever seen? I found mostly a value of one. Here is my highest wf-experience: http://wiki.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/Spezial:Popularpages. We should discuss the categorizing scheme. I think: one cat for each individual factor would be ok? Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:49, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | : I would include the new parameter directly into [[template:size]], first without auto-categorizing. This can be added later. What is the highest wiki factor you've ever seen? I found mostly a value of one. Here is my highest wf-experience: http://wiki.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/Spezial:Popularpages. We should discuss the categorizing scheme. I think: one cat for each individual factor would be ok? Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:49, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: Or even better: size and the new parameter should be integrated into [[template:wiki]]. You see: We need a task force of [[Special:Version|MediaWiki version 1.10.x]] template programmers. [[Proposal:integrate new data into template:wiki]] ;-) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:55, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | :: Or even better: size and the new parameter should be integrated into [[template:wiki]]. You see: We need a task force of [[Special:Version|MediaWiki version 1.10.x]] template programmers. [[Proposal:integrate new data into template:wiki]] ;-) --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:55, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Re: biggest wikiFactor. The 'raw' data for wikipedia is not publicly available, but I suspect their wikiFactor is huge. The most popular wiki on wikia is WoWWiki, which has a wikiFactor of 187. With regards to "one cat for each individual factor", perhaps some ''pseudo''-logarithmic grouping would be more appropriate. I.e 1,2,3,4,5,6,7... 10, 20 , 30,...100, 200.. etc --[[User:Spud Gun | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Spud_Gun |talk]]) 06:30, 24 March 2009 (EDT) | |||