5,637
edits
WikiIndex talk:Community talk: Difference between revisions
Site reviews
(→Two wikis, one name: Two sites, transformed) |
(Site reviews) |
||
| Line 525: | Line 525: | ||
Anyhoo, I put this up here, so that people can talk about what should be done. At the very least, I'd like to see the dead URLs retained but disabled. [[User:David Shepheard|David Shepheard]] 10:15, 12 April 2009 (EDT) | Anyhoo, I put this up here, so that people can talk about what should be done. At the very least, I'd like to see the dead URLs retained but disabled. [[User:David Shepheard|David Shepheard]] 10:15, 12 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Site reviews == | |||
I recently admonished an anonymous user that this site is about indexing wikis, not providing one's own personal perspective about them. However, now that I look deeper into it, this rule exists in my head, not on WikiIndex. True, we don't typically provide a lot of subjective information about the wikis we list here, but there's really nothing saying that we can't. I brought this up to [[MarkDilley]] and he said that this is a community issue. So I'm bringing it up here on the Community talk page. :-) | |||
Do we see usefulness in providing reviews or personal experience about the wikis we index here? If so, what limits (if any) should there be regarding this? | |||
My personal take is that this could be a useful tool for site visitors. However, a review is only as good as the reviewer. I'd hate to see this site overrun by comments like "this wiki sux". Any thoughts? | |||
--[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:09, 8 May 2009 (EDT) | |||