WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions

WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy (edit)

Revision as of 19:32, 10 July 2009

98 bytes added , 10 July 2009

no edit summary

Proxima Centauri

1,853

edits

Revision as of 19:31, 10 July 2009 (edit) Proxima Centauri (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:32, 10 July 2009 (edit) (undo) Proxima Centauri (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Spambots don't have feelings so it doesn't matter whether you are consistent not. I sometimes take character into consideration as well as the offense, that’s why I was harsher to [[User:Patricia Martellotti]] than to [[User:ChrisChanSonichu]] [[User:Proxima Centauri\|Proxima Centauri]] 10:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT)		Spambots don't have feelings so it doesn't matter whether you are consistent not. I sometimes take character into consideration as well as the offense, that’s why I was harsher to [[User:Patricia Martellotti]] than to [[User:ChrisChanSonichu]] [[User:Proxima Centauri\|Proxima Centauri]] 10:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

	Trolls and vandals sometimes mix constructive edits with vandalism for varied reasons though the main reason is to hide unconstructive edits. Then sysops stop giving suspicious edits that might be good faith edits the benifit of any doubt. Next stage:_ complaints of sysop abuse etc that may or may not be justified. [[User:Proxima Centauri\|Proxima Centauri]] 15:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT)		Trolls and vandals sometimes mix constructive edits with vandalism for varied reasons though the main reason is to hide unconstructive edits. Then sysops stop giving suspicious edits that might be good faith edits the benifit of any doubt, this hapens especially often if the sysop has just spent a long time cleaning up after vandalism. Next stage:- complaints of sysop abuse etc that may or may not be justified. [[User:Proxima Centauri\|Proxima Centauri]] 15:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT)