|
|
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| Is there any way to objectively decide whether the "first block time" is too long or too short? | | Is there any way to objectively decide whether the "first block time" is too long or too short? |
| --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:11, 21 June 2009 (EDT) | | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:11, 21 June 2009 (EDT) |
|
| |
| :On Wikipedia, if you block someone, they can still edit their own talk page. I don't know if that's in effect here, but I assume it is a configurable parameter. The advantage of this is that the blocked party has a venue to ask to be unblocked if they think that they have been blocked unfairly. This would particularly be useful for situations where we've blocked IP addresses which are used or reused by multiple people, for example, a school.
| |
|
| |
| :As far as deciding on whether a block is too long or too short, I think that's always going to be subjective. So, we can either be arbitrary and define what's appropriate. Or we can let admins do as they deem appropriate. I think it's even fair game to shorten the length of a ban set by another admin. I see it happen frequently on Wikipedia - with justification, of course.
| |
|
| |
| :I don't think that I've blocked many people here at WikiIndex and then only in cases of obvious vandalism or spamming. I tend to fall on the draconian side - I'm pretty sure that my blocks have always been non-expiring. However, I'm perfectly happy to use a system of escalating blocks according to repeated incidents. On Wikipedia, it's non uncommon for a first-time offender of its various rules to be blocked for 24 hours. It then usually escalates to 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, or infinity. For us, we could set the block interval at any arbitrary point in between. I don't think we should be too lenient, though. If someone continues to vandalize or spam after being blocked twice, it seems to me that we should just ban them forever. I'm open to suggestion, however. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:55, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == See also == | | == See also == |
| * [[Spam Control Policy]] | | * [[Spam Control Policy]] |
| * [[AntiSpamMeasures]] | | * [[AntiSpamMeasures]] |