1,853
edits
WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions
WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy (view source)
Revision as of 17:16, 11 July 2009
, 11 July 2009no edit summary
m (Moving my reply to talk page - I see that the same discussion is happening there) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Is there any way to objectively decide whether the "first block time" is too long or too short? | Is there any way to objectively decide whether the "first block time" is too long or too short? | ||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:11, 21 June 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:11, 21 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
For minor offenses warnings should be given out the first time. Users who have been warned will certainly see the warning when they get a notice that they have new messages. A short block may be overlooked if the user did not try to edit during the block period. If an offense is repeated after a warning administrators can assume the user knew his/her behavour was unacceptable. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Spam Control Policy]] | * [[Spam Control Policy]] | ||
* [[AntiSpamMeasures]] | * [[AntiSpamMeasures]] | ||