WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions
Comment subjective. information inacurate. Comment is affecting user in real life. Also user has expressed no interest in being on wiki.
No edit summary |
(Comment subjective. information inacurate. Comment is affecting user in real life. Also user has expressed no interest in being on wiki.) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
From the blockee’s point of view being blocked is more unpleasant and more punishing that, for example finding that a wiki is no longer online or is temporarily out of edit mode for everyone. Ban windows are designed by expert advertisers to be unpleasant. | From the blockee’s point of view being blocked is more unpleasant and more punishing that, for example finding that a wiki is no longer online or is temporarily out of edit mode for everyone. Ban windows are designed by expert advertisers to be unpleasant. | ||
Spambots don't have feelings so it doesn't matter whether you are consistent not. I sometimes take character into consideration as well as the offense, that’s why I was harsher to [[ | Spambots don't have feelings so it doesn't matter whether you are consistent not. I sometimes take character into consideration as well as the offense, that’s why I was harsher to [[inactive]] than to [[User:ChrisChanSonichu]] [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 10:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Trolls and vandals sometimes mix constructive edits with vandalism for varied reasons though the main reason is to hide unconstructive edits. Then sysops stop giving suspicious edits that might be good faith edits the benifit of any doubt, this hapens especially often if the sysop has just spent a long time cleaning up after vandalism. Next stage:- complaints of sysop abuse etc that may or may not be justified. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 15:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | Trolls and vandals sometimes mix constructive edits with vandalism for varied reasons though the main reason is to hide unconstructive edits. Then sysops stop giving suspicious edits that might be good faith edits the benifit of any doubt, this hapens especially often if the sysop has just spent a long time cleaning up after vandalism. Next stage:- complaints of sysop abuse etc that may or may not be justified. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 15:31, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||