User talk:DavidCary: Difference between revisions

User talk:DavidCary (edit)

Revision as of 07:21, 14 July 2009

1,290 bytes added , 14 July 2009

missing half the story?

DavidCary

Administrators

1,316

edits

@@ Line 154: / Line 154: @@
 :::::I've recreated her userpage because I'm fed up of the way she got me into trouble and if [[User:Sean Fennel|Sean Fennel]] hadn’t tracked her down to Wikipedia she’d have got away with some of it.  I feel she’s intelligent and deceitful and we should warn people about her.  If other administrator disagree with me for recreating her page please delete it again. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 04:41, 27 June 2009 (EDT)
+:::::: What I'm seeing diverges so strongly from the above description that it makes me think I'm missing half the story. ''"she’d have got away with some of it"'' ? ''"deceitful"'' ? ''"troublemaking"'' ? ''"she got me into trouble"'' ?
+:::::: Could you link to a diff supporting any of these accusations?
+:::::: What I see is that over a year ago, she (1) blanked the WikiIndex [[Welcome]] page and a few pages at Wikipedia. Later she (2) put some information about herself, including a single URL to her non-wiki website (but without the WikiSyntax to make it active) on her "User" page. Then (3) she sent Sean Fennel an email asking for all traces of her at WikiIndex to disappear.
+:::::: May I ask which of these 3 things was something "deceitful" that we don't want her to "get away with"? Or is there something else I'm missing? The (1) was wrong, but a common newbie mistake and arguably not "deceitful" -- and there's no chance that she would have gotten away with in 2009 since it was reverted soon after it happened in 2008 -- and apparently she's learned from that, since she hasn't done that in over a year. I fail to see how (2) or (3) even merit a block, much less a permanent page criticizing her without balance. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:21, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
 == Block ==