1,853
edits
User talk:DavidCary: Difference between revisions
→PATRICIA MARTELLOTTI
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== test - this is only a test == | |||
Please ignore this test for John about email. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:20, 14 May 2006 (EDT) | Please ignore this test for John about email. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 01:20, 14 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
:::::: May I ask which of these 3 things was something "deceitful" that we don't want her to "get away with"? Or is there something else I'm missing? The (1) was wrong, but a common newbie mistake and arguably not "deceitful" -- and there's no chance that she would have gotten away with in 2009 since it was reverted soon after it happened in 2008 -- and apparently she's learned from that, since she hasn't done that in over a year. I fail to see how (2) or (3) even merit a block, much less a permanent page criticizing her without balance. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:21, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | :::::: May I ask which of these 3 things was something "deceitful" that we don't want her to "get away with"? Or is there something else I'm missing? The (1) was wrong, but a common newbie mistake and arguably not "deceitful" -- and there's no chance that she would have gotten away with in 2009 since it was reverted soon after it happened in 2008 -- and apparently she's learned from that, since she hasn't done that in over a year. I fail to see how (2) or (3) even merit a block, much less a permanent page criticizing her without balance. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 03:21, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
This user has caused problems on [[Wikipedia]] where her [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Patricia_Martellotti user page] was blanked for spamming and her [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Patricia_Martellotti talk page] was also deleted. She [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Patricia_Martellotti vandalized] Wikipedia and is permanently [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3APatricia+Martellotti blocked] there. When she was here she played the same games and pretended she was naive though she knew what had happened at Wikipedia. She says the accusations are false though anyone who folows the links can see that they are true. I call that deceit and it's a bit unrealistic as anyone can follow the links and find out the truth. I overlooked that the edit to the Welcome template was [http://www.wikiindex.org/Special:Contributions/PATRICIA_MARTELLOTTI last year] sorry, still I feel she was oversensitive when I warmed her. She seems interested in self promotion and complaining and uninterested in editing constructively. | This user has caused problems on [[Wikipedia]] where her [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Patricia_Martellotti user page] was blanked for spamming and her [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Patricia_Martellotti talk page] was also deleted. She [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Patricia_Martellotti vandalized] Wikipedia and is permanently [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3APatricia+Martellotti blocked] there. When she was here she played the same games and pretended she was naive though she knew what had happened at Wikipedia. She says the accusations are false though anyone who folows the links can see that they are true. I call that deceit and it's a bit unrealistic as anyone can follow the links and find out the truth. I overlooked that the edit to the Welcome template was [http://www.wikiindex.org/Special:Contributions/PATRICIA_MARTELLOTTI last year] sorry, still I feel she was oversensitive when I warmed her. She seems interested in self promotion and complaining and uninterested in editing constructively though '''constructive editors are allowed a little self promotion on their userpages'''. | ||
I agree it doesn't merit a page of permanent criticism and have deleted criticism after a week or so. Is there any I overlooked? | I agree it doesn't merit a page of permanent criticism and have deleted criticism after a week or so. Is there any I overlooked? [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 13:00, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Block == | == Block == | ||