4
edits
User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions
→Assume Good Faith
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (I want a cooling off period) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Yet she doesn't assume good faith. She has now blocked Phantom Hoover2 who has helped revert the vandalism. | :Yet she doesn't assume good faith. She has now blocked Phantom Hoover2 who has helped revert the vandalism. | ||
::BtW, don't unblock Phantom Hoover2, unblock Phantom Hoover; I'm fed up with using my neighbour's WiFi. [[User:70.84.211.82|70.84.211.82]] 06:36, 24 August 2009 (EDT) | ::BtW, don't unblock Phantom Hoover2, unblock Phantom Hoover; I'm fed up with using my neighbour's WiFi. [[User:70.84.211.82|70.84.211.82]] 06:36, 24 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
She may have done a lot of work, but that doesn't excuse her behavior. She failed to assume good faith when Phantom Hoover removed the offending paragraph in [[RationalWiki]], then she blocked me without warning with the justification that since I've edited Phantom Hoover's talk page, I should know that removing content is a blockable offense. She did not justify any of her reversions. It seems she didn't even read the edits she reverted, because she then asked a question that she would know the answer to had she read the edit. [[User:Please unblock Nx and his IP, thank you|Please unblock Nx and his IP, thank you]] 06:39, 24 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
== I want a cooling off period == | == I want a cooling off period == | ||
Phantom Hoover - will you accept that? ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | Phantom Hoover - will you accept that? ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||