1,136
edits
User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions
→Thanks to everyone for the cooling off - here is my idea on how to move through this.
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:'''Please note that we are an index of wiki, wiki people and wiki ideas, contributions outside of that scope may be treated as test edits and be removed.''' --[[User:Spud Gun | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Spud_Gun |talk]]) 06:12, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | :'''Please note that we are an index of wiki, wiki people and wiki ideas, contributions outside of that scope may be treated as test edits and be removed.''' --[[User:Spud Gun | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Spud_Gun |talk]]) 06:12, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::This wasn't about interwiki disputes, it was about Proxima Centauri abusing her sysop powers to promote her own site and keep a flawed, inaccurate version of the page from being edited. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 07:08, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | ::This wasn't about interwiki disputes, it was about Proxima Centauri abusing her sysop powers to promote her own site and keep a flawed, inaccurate version of the page from being edited. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 07:08, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:IMO there is no crime in promoting your site a little. E.g. I've started the [[Bee Train Fan Wiki]] article primarily to promote it (since I am its founder). However, you've got to respect others' opinions, as well. If moving controversial stuff to the talk pages is acceptable to all parties involved, I can only support it. Otherwise, I'd strongly support the removal of ''all'' controversial content from corresponding articles ''and'' their talk pages. Don't trouble trouble until trouble troubles you and don't touch a running system is my policy. --[[User:Koveras|Koveras]] 15:44, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | :IMO there is no crime in promoting your site a little. E.g. I've started the [[Bee Train Fan Wiki]] article primarily to promote it (since I am its founder). However, you've got to respect others' opinions, as well. If moving controversial stuff to the talk pages is acceptable to all parties involved, I can only support it. Otherwise, I'd strongly support the removal of ''all'' controversial content from corresponding articles ''and'' their talk pages. Don't trouble trouble until trouble troubles you and don't touch a running system is my policy. --[[User:Koveras|Koveras]] 15:44, 26 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
Sorry, but Proxima has demonstrated that she has no qualms about locking and blocking to prevent people from questioning her. I cannot accept her getting off with yet another abuse of power. She has already locked articles on at least three separate occasions to prevent people cleaning up her terrible writing and ovious vendettas, and she seems not to care. She should be stripped of her sysop powers. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:51, 27 August 2009 (EDT) | Sorry, but Proxima has demonstrated that she has no qualms about locking and blocking to prevent people from questioning her. I cannot accept her getting off with yet another abuse of power. She has already locked articles on at least three separate occasions to prevent people cleaning up her terrible writing and ovious vendettas, and she seems not to care. She should be stripped of her sysop powers. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:51, 27 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I think it is a bit foolish to fire a volunteer, when there is apparently nothing stopping us from changing [[Editing etiquette|the policy they were apparently following]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:53, 28 August 2009 (EDT) | |||