WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions

Line 5: Line 5:
== Enforcement policies ==
== Enforcement policies ==


===Regarding editors===
When naming policies it helps to specify what type of "enforcement" is appropriate for the "violation". Here are some suggested enforcement categories:
When naming policies it helps to specify what type of "enforcement" is appropriate for the "violation". Here are some suggested enforcement categories:
# '''Etiquette:''' Guide to help polite people to be polite. Does not imply any enforcement.
*'''Etiquette:''' Guide to help polite people to be polite. Does not imply any enforcement.
# '''Tag:''' Placing "warning tags" on info that is dubious, impolite, etc. What categories of info warrents this?
* '''Tag:''' Placing "warning tags" on info that is dubious, impolite, etc. What categories of info warrents this?
# '''Eventual deletion:''' What categories of info should be deleted eventually, if the warning tags are ignored?
* '''Eventual deletion:''' What categories of info should be deleted eventually, if the warning tags are ignored?
# '''Speedy deletion'''
* '''Speedy deletion'''
# '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost.
* '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost.
# '''Block editor:''' See [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy]].
* '''Block editor:''' See [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy]].
 
===Regarding administrators===
 
(Administrators are sysops, bureaucrats, etc.)


I suggest we discuss block policy [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy|there]], and that it is good that we '''clearly separate the [[Editing etiquette|etiquette policy]] from the [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy|enforcement policy]]''', because "enforcing politeness" isn't always polite nor is is always practical at archiving its ends.
I suggest we discuss block policy [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy|there]], and that it is good that we '''clearly separate the [[Editing etiquette|etiquette policy]] from the [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy|enforcement policy]]''', because "enforcing politeness" isn't always polite nor is is always practical at archiving its ends.
====Suggested requests====
What you may request of other administrators if you have evidence that an administrator is in violation of these policies:
* '''Undoing the block or protection'''
* '''Dispute resolution''' (Ask another sysop)
* '''Demotion of the administrator''' (temporarily or permanently)
====Bring this evidence====
Don't waste their time, bring your evidence and be concise. For example, if you believe a sysop has blocked a user or protected a page without good reason. Do the following:
*Copy their stated reason for the blocks, protection, or deletion. (This should be in the [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page= block log]. If they did not leave a reason, state that they left no reason.)
*A link to the diff showing the "offenses" which were their stated reason for the block.
*State your request (see "Suggested requests", above)
*A brief statement as to why you feel this is necessary.


----
----
1,136

edits