174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
m
→Similar wikis: whoops, moving section to bottom
(→Arguments that Liberapedia (or certain descriptions) should be included (rebuttals welcome): clarification, question) |
m (→Similar wikis: whoops, moving section to bottom) |
||
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
*If we add only a link to [[Liberapedia]], this would not take up very much space or detract from the article. (Posted by [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]]) | *If we add only a link to [[Liberapedia]], this would not take up very much space or detract from the article. (Posted by [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]]) | ||
===Arguments that Liberapedia (or certain descriptions) should NOT be included (rebuttals welcome)=== | ===Arguments that Liberapedia (or certain descriptions) should NOT be included (rebuttals welcome)=== | ||
| Line 218: | Line 215: | ||
*If LP devotes a lot of time to CP this information should be in the LP article and the CP article. It is not, of itself, an argument for it to be in the RW article.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 05:28, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | *If LP devotes a lot of time to CP this information should be in the LP article and the CP article. It is not, of itself, an argument for it to be in the RW article.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 05:28, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Agreed that it should be in the Liberpedia article and the Conservapedia article, but I don't see how that has any bearing on it being included here. Readers may be interested in RationalWiki for its criticism of religious fundamentalism. They may be interested in Liberapedia for the same reason. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:33, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :Agreed that it should be in the Liberpedia article and the Conservapedia article, but I don't see how that has any bearing on it being included here. Readers may be interested in RationalWiki for its criticism of religious fundamentalism. They may be interested in Liberapedia for the same reason. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:33, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
===What is Liberapedia about anyway=== | |||
I thought it was a parody of CP (a leftist equivalent), but it seems it sometimes gets confused and thinks it's a serious encyclopedia refuting CP and fundamentalism. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 12:30, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||