1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→What is Liberapedia about anyway
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
::I don't really think there's a need for a separate article for criticism, what's wrong with a criticism section? I simply don't see how a separate article solves any problems. Also, I'm not fond of the idea of including "user reviews" of wikis, because that's just a way to circumvent referencing (it's just an opinion, it doesn't need to be substantiated...). Note that I'm not against criticism being presented. Ideally, this wiki should have admins who oversee the content of articles, so that any criticism is well referenced and true. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:34, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::I don't really think there's a need for a separate article for criticism, what's wrong with a criticism section? I simply don't see how a separate article solves any problems. Also, I'm not fond of the idea of including "user reviews" of wikis, because that's just a way to circumvent referencing (it's just an opinion, it doesn't need to be substantiated...). Note that I'm not against criticism being presented. Ideally, this wiki should have admins who oversee the content of articles, so that any criticism is well referenced and true. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:34, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::So you are okay then with having a criticism section in the RationalWiki article? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:49, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::So you are okay then with having a criticism section in the RationalWiki article? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:49, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::...if we require user reviews are referenced? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:51, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||