174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→What is Liberapedia about anyway: ec
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
::I don't really think there's a need for a separate article for criticism, what's wrong with a criticism section? I simply don't see how a separate article solves any problems. Also, I'm not fond of the idea of including "user reviews" of wikis, because that's just a way to circumvent referencing (it's just an opinion, it doesn't need to be substantiated...). Note that I'm not against criticism being presented. Ideally, this wiki should have admins who oversee the content of articles, so that any criticism is well referenced and true. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:34, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::I don't really think there's a need for a separate article for criticism, what's wrong with a criticism section? I simply don't see how a separate article solves any problems. Also, I'm not fond of the idea of including "user reviews" of wikis, because that's just a way to circumvent referencing (it's just an opinion, it doesn't need to be substantiated...). Note that I'm not against criticism being presented. Ideally, this wiki should have admins who oversee the content of articles, so that any criticism is well referenced and true. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:34, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::So you are okay then with having a criticism section in the RationalWiki article? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:49, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::So you are okay then with having a criticism section in the RationalWiki article? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:49, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::I never said I wasn't. I'm opposed to PC using this article as her little playground and locking out everyone else. She has Liberapedia for that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:59, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::...if we require user reviews are referenced? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:51, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::...if we require user reviews are referenced? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:51, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Probably most wikis wouldn't need more than a little criticism section, but look at all that has been posted to talk pages. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:57, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::Probably most wikis wouldn't need more than a little criticism section, but look at all that has been posted to talk pages. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:57, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Having separate pages would allow us to leave one unprotected while the other is protected, if edit warring is only happening on one of them. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:57, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::Having separate pages would allow us to leave one unprotected while the other is protected, if edit warring is only happening on one of them. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:57, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::(ec) I'm more opposed to the format. I don't think it's a good idea to have a bunch of random people saying "I like this place very much they are teh funney.", with the occasional "They are very mean because they reverted my extremely well written and unbiased additions, see here." [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:59, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||