174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→What is Liberapedia about anyway: replies
(→What is Liberapedia about anyway: replies) |
|||
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
:::::It wouldn't work in practice, because if the main article is not protected, the link to the criticism article can be removed. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::It wouldn't work in practice, because if the main article is not protected, the link to the criticism article can be removed. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::Perhaps not if editors believe that would only mean the main article would be protected, and the link replaced. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:08, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::::Perhaps not if editors believe that would only mean the main article would be protected, and the link replaced. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:08, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::I doubt that would happen in practice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:20, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::(ec) I'm more opposed to the format. I don't think it's a good idea to have a bunch of random people saying "I like this place very much they are teh funney.", with the occasional "They are very mean because they reverted my extremely well written and unbiased additions, see here." [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:59, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::(ec) I'm more opposed to the format. I don't think it's a good idea to have a bunch of random people saying "I like this place very much they are teh funney.", with the occasional "They are very mean because they reverted my extremely well written and unbiased additions, see here." [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:59, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::They would be required to provide sources for that information, but I don't see that it does much damage otherwise. It is obviously just someone's claimed experience. Now if they have a certain reputation on the other hand... this is why I suggest there be signed posts. Just like that debate up there about linking to Liberapedia. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:08, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::They would be required to provide sources for that information, but I don't see that it does much damage otherwise. It is obviously just someone's claimed experience. Now if they have a certain reputation on the other hand... this is why I suggest there be signed posts. Just like that debate up there about linking to Liberapedia. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:08, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::Like I said, I don't like the format. It's non-encyclopedic, redundant, and generally a mess. But that's just my 2c. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:20, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||