174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Criticism and rebuttals
(Criticism and rebuttals) |
|||
| Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
::::::Like I said, I don't like the format. It's non-encyclopedic, redundant, and generally a mess. But that's just my 2c. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:20, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::::Like I said, I don't like the format. It's non-encyclopedic, redundant, and generally a mess. But that's just my 2c. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:20, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Well we could always use talk pages for all these opinions and whatnot. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:46, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::::Well we could always use talk pages for all these opinions and whatnot. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:46, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Criticism and rebuttals == | |||
I don't see how this wiki could possibly expect to compete realistically with Wikipedia, in terms of the "official" goals that are listed at the top of this article. It does however have an interesting and active community and Wikipedia does not allow satire. ([[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]]) | |||
:It does not try to compete with Wikipedia. To put it simply: WP's policies do not allow it to call bullshit (e.g. creation "science" etc.) bullshit. RW can do that, and can also be funny while doing it. There's also nothing about competing with Wikipedia in the site's official goals. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||