174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→Criticism and rebuttals: quote from our community standards
(→Criticism and rebuttals: quote from our community standards) |
|||
| Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Hum. Well here is [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral that policy on neutrality]. Are you saying that RW is biased or it lacks reliable sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::Hum. Well here is [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral that policy on neutrality]. Are you saying that RW is biased or it lacks reliable sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::Quote from our community standards: | |||
"RationalWiki does not use Wikipedia's well-known "Neutral Point of View". We have our own version: SPOV. SPOV means two things: | |||
Snarky point of view — This is the meaning most people refer to. It means that, to keep our articles from being dry and boring, we spice it up with humor, sarcasm, skepticism, satire, and wit. | |||
Scientific point of view — Less talked about but arguably more important, the scientific point of view means that our articles take the side of the scientific consensus on an issue. RationalWiki should be and will be highly critical of any unscientific, irrational, or just plain stupid idea, movement, or ideology. | |||
Our official policy on religion is that we do not have an official policy on religion. Our community of editors includes followers of various religions, as well as many atheists. Please bear this in mind when editing. | |||
However, our scientific point of view respects the scientific method as the most reliable framework for researching and understanding what happens in our universe. For this reason, we are critical of both religious and secular movements which oppose or ignore scientific thought and knowledge." | |||
::::::[[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::Sorry I misread. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::Sorry I misread. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||