174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→Criticism and rebuttals: difference is we are not neutral
(→Criticism and rebuttals: difference is we are not neutral) |
|||
| Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
::::::[[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::::[[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Well as long as you are providing the "evidence" of the "science". I still contend that the difference is satire. Perhaps you have a different criteria of valid evidence? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:02, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::::Well as long as you are providing the "evidence" of the "science". I still contend that the difference is satire. Perhaps you have a different criteria of valid evidence? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:02, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::What evidence of what science? Anyway, the difference is that we are not "neutral" (as defined by Wikipedia anyway). While their Existence of God page lists the various arguments but does not take sides, ours would say that it does not exist. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 16:15, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::Sorry I misread. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::Sorry I misread. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||