174
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→Criticism and rebuttals: It does not take sides.
(→Criticism and rebuttals: It does not take sides.) |
|||
| Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
::::::::::I can't tell, but I'm pretty sure that Wikipedia does not say that God does not exist. You missed my point [[User:Nx|Nx]] 17:11, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::::I can't tell, but I'm pretty sure that Wikipedia does not say that God does not exist. You missed my point [[User:Nx|Nx]] 17:11, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::No it only offers a number of definitions of gods and tells you why they don't exist. But don't you have a reliable source for this information? Perhaps Wikipedia just isn't following their own policy as well as you are. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:55, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::No it only offers a number of definitions of gods and tells you why they don't exist. But don't you have a reliable source for this information? Perhaps Wikipedia just isn't following their own policy as well as you are. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:55, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::It does not tell you why they don't exist. It tells you why some people believe they don't exist, and also tells you why some other people believe they do exist. It does not take sides. It does not tell you which one is correct. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 18:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::What is the problem with merging the old CP article into Wikipedia? Lack of sources? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::What old CP article? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||