146
edits
No edit summary |
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Er, Lumenos, you could also not screw up talk pages in the first place. "Reordering it" would probably consist of reverting to before you mucked it up. Nice work of applying your rather unique mental processes to a shared space. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:17, 1 September 2009 (EDT) |
edits