146
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 11:21, 1 September 2009
, 1 September 2009→Criticism and rebuttals
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 274: | Line 274: | ||
:It does not try to compete with Wikipedia. To put it simply: WP's policies do not allow it to call bullshit (e.g. creation "science" etc.) bullshit. RW can do that, and can also be funny while doing it. There's also nothing about competing with Wikipedia in the site's official goals. In fact some of us are quite zealous when it comes to off-mission articles (e.g. some pretty well written math articles copied from CP, where they were deleted by Ed Poor because he didn't understand them, were deleted on RW because they were off-mission, and WP would always have a better article about the subject anyway). We know that we stand no chance against WP in its home turf. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :It does not try to compete with Wikipedia. To put it simply: WP's policies do not allow it to call bullshit (e.g. creation "science" etc.) bullshit. RW can do that, and can also be funny while doing it. There's also nothing about competing with Wikipedia in the site's official goals. In fact some of us are quite zealous when it comes to off-mission articles (e.g. some pretty well written math articles copied from CP, where they were deleted by Ed Poor because he didn't understand them, were deleted on RW because they were off-mission, and WP would always have a better article about the subject anyway). We know that we stand no chance against WP in its home turf. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:47, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::What you can't do at Wikipedia is Conservapedia (or Liberapedia). I think your stated goals should include satire, since that is really what sets you apart. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::What you can't do at Wikipedia is Conservapedia (or Liberapedia). I think your stated goals should include satire, since that is really what sets you apart. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:04, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Lumenos, you ''really'' don't understand what RW ''is'' do you? As in, embarrassingly so? (Granted it's down right now, but its goals are listed in this article). It's got nothing to do with wikipedia. It's ''not'' an encyclopedia. And why have you made such a mess of this talk page? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:21, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::No it ''isn't''. It is that we have a specific point of view; a scientific one. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:10, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::I wasn't talking about dirty words Lumenos, I was talking about not being neutral. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:14, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||