WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions

Line 160: Line 160:


I think that criticism should not be allowed at all, because it just provokes destructive debates; imagine if Proxima's complaints about her privacy had been left on a page dedicated to it — there would have been a bloodbath. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:21, 30 August 2009 (EDT)
I think that criticism should not be allowed at all, because it just provokes destructive debates; imagine if Proxima's complaints about her privacy had been left on a page dedicated to it — there would have been a bloodbath. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:21, 30 August 2009 (EDT)
:What do you mean a bloodbath? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:41, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
 
:I think we should use various policies to mitigate both the criticism and the self-indulgence. A requirement of reliable sources, for example, if a claim is claiming to be more than someone's opinion. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:41, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
DavidCary argues [[Talk:RationalWiki#Wikiindex|against a criticism section in the RationalWiki article]] for some sort of "biased" reason.


==Claims and evidence==
==Claims and evidence==
1,136

edits