WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions

WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines (view source)

Revision as of 15:10, 2 September 2009

216 bytes removed , 2 September 2009

→‎How sympathetic or critical? (Who decides?): uhh I fixed it. <irony from my talk page> (I forgot to put the link)

Lumenos

1,136

edits

@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
 :::(Proxima is a sysop here.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT)
 :::I propose that critical articles may contain rebuttals to criticisms. ([[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:33, 31 August 2009 (EDT))
+:::MarkDilly seems to be the most (or only) active bureaucrat, [[Criticism"Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|in one example he wrote that he suggested a criticism page that was called "Constructive"]].
-:::MarkDilly seems to be the most (or only) active bureaucrat, he wrote, "I can understand that folks from Conservapedia don't want the page on [[WikiIndex]] about their wiki to be overrun by criticism - and I can also understand that people want to talk about problems they have with the wiki.  Why not take it to a page [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]] and simply make one line / link on the [[Conservapedia]] page pointing to this.  ~~ [[MarkDilley]]"
 ::::I don't think the term "Constructive" is necessary, but I think we should define "constructive"  according to our policies on notability, verifiability, and/or something to do with preventing harm. It might not be a bad way of suggesting it however. I'd support either. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT)
 ::::I appreciate the restraint and professionalism that everyone is displaying here. I'd just like everyone to know that I'm not gonna post some witty statement like "BWAM", because that is not the purpose of this policy page. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT)