1,136
edits
WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions
WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy (edit)
Revision as of 07:28, 3 September 2009
, 3 September 2009→Biographical info: apology
(→"Protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm": changed subsection to top-level section) |
(→Biographical info: apology) |
||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
:: You may be able to convince me that we shouldn't display offensive wiki logos, and perhaps you may convince me that we shouldn't make an easily-clickable active link to an illegal site. But to completely censor every mention of a wiki? How does "pretend that evil wiki don't exist" help our users? | :: You may be able to convince me that we shouldn't display offensive wiki logos, and perhaps you may convince me that we shouldn't make an easily-clickable active link to an illegal site. But to completely censor every mention of a wiki? How does "pretend that evil wiki don't exist" help our users? | ||
:: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:35, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | :: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:35, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::I apologize for assuming that you would be focused on the privacy issue. In my haste, I completely ignored the clear opening statement, "Wikipedia has an excellent Wikipedia:Blocking policy. The WikiIndex blocking policy is pretty much the same, except that -- since WikiIndex runs at a slower pace than Wikipedia -- we start with a longer 'first block time'. In summary:..." So I suppose the only difference you are suggesting, between Wikipedia's policy and WikiIndex, is the time of the first block? (It now seems obvious that you are.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:28, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
=="Protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm"== | =="Protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm"== | ||