|
|
| Line 142: |
Line 142: |
| :::Do you mind if I copy, the last three paragraphs of your statement in this section, to [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Excluding_wikis_from_WikiIndex]], and respond to it there? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:11, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | | :::Do you mind if I copy, the last three paragraphs of your statement in this section, to [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Excluding_wikis_from_WikiIndex]], and respond to it there? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:11, 3 September 2009 (EDT) |
| :::The things you have already written may be difficult for new editors to find. In general, do you mind your statements being quoted (with a link back to the original location) and copied to other locations? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:57, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | | :::The things you have already written may be difficult for new editors to find. In general, do you mind your statements being quoted (with a link back to the original location) and copied to other locations? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:57, 3 September 2009 (EDT) |
|
| |
| =="Protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm"==
| |
|
| |
| Regarding block policy proprosal, "[u]sers may be blocked from editing by an administrator to protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm", DavidCary has elaborated that, "It was intended to be a quick summary of the line between 'the seven actions which are blockable offenses' vs. 'actions which, while rude and annoying, are not quite bad enough to be blockable'." [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:05, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| :Please tell me if the above paragraph is inaccurate or misleading in any way. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:05, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| :I don't understand that. Is the intended meaning of, "[u]sers may be blocked from editing by an administrator to protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm", '''completely''' expressed in the following rules:
| |
|
| |
| :A user may be blocked when necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of [WikiIndex], its users or the public. A block for protection may be necessary in response to:
| |
| :* persistently making [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]];
| |
| :* making personal, professional or [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal]] threats (including outside the Wikipedia site);
| |
| :* performing actions that place users in danger;
| |
| :* disclosing [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Posting of personal information|personal information]] (whether or not the information is accurate);
| |
| :* persistently [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|violating copyrights]];
| |
| :* persistently posting unreferenced or potentially defamatory information about [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]];
| |
| :* accounts that appear to have been compromised, as an emergency measure.
| |
| :? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:05, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| :
| |
| :Secondly, when you say, "actions which, while rude and annoying, are not quite bad enough to be blockable", are you referring to the section of the Wikipedia policy page, entitled: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_policy#Disruption Disruption]? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| ::If so, there is a subsection there entitled, "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_policy#Disruption-only Disruption-only]", in reference to these the policy states a that, "Furthermore, some types of user accounts are considered disruptive and may be blocked without warning, usually indefinitely:" I assume you are proposing to enforce this policy, however. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
| |