1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 03:29, 4 September 2009
, 4 September 2009Should Wikipedia be included in the comparison table?
(Should Wikipedia be included in the comparison table?) |
|||
| Line 398: | Line 398: | ||
==Should [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (ASK) be included as a Similar Wiki or in a comparison table?== | ==Should [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (ASK) be included as a Similar Wiki or in a comparison table?== | ||
I think [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] ought to be included. It is represented in the criticism section, but being that it seems to be administrated better than [[Conservapedia]] (which isn't saying much) it does have that in common with RationalWiki. They are both alternatives or offshoots of Conservapedia. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:00, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | I think [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] ought to be included. It is represented in the criticism section, but being that it seems to be administrated better than [[Conservapedia]] (which isn't saying much) it does have that in common with RationalWiki. They are both alternatives or offshoots of Conservapedia. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:00, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Should Wikipedia be included in the comparison table? == | |||
I don't think Wikipedia should be included in a similar wikis section but I think it should be included in nearly any comparison table because it has content on nearly any subject, and more such may be added/"addable". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:29, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||