Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,133
edits
WikiIndex talk:Editing etiquette: Difference between revisions
strikethough seems to be the same as rewritting or deleting.
No edit summary |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (strikethough seems to be the same as rewritting or deleting.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Strikethroughs have no place in an article. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Strikethroughs have no place in an article. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Contrary to popular opinion, having your work deleted or rewritten is to be expected on wikis. It sucks, and if you can't accept that, I suggest you try a different format (e.g. a blog). [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::Contrary to popular opinion, having your work deleted or rewritten is to be expected on wikis. It sucks, and if you can't accept that, I suggest you try a different format (e.g. a blog). [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::: '''Strikethrough is the same as having your work deleted or rewritten. ~~ [[MarkDilley]]''' | |||
:::Are strikeouts more appropriate for unfacts placed on talk pages? ;-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:08, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | :::Are strikeouts more appropriate for unfacts placed on talk pages? ;-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:08, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::This would be an example of what, IMO, would constitute an "unsubstantiated opinion": "Strikethroughs have no place in an article." Umm do you imagine yourself to be a higher authority that the bureaucrat who wrote this guideline? Just my 2c. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:08, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::This would be an example of what, IMO, would constitute an "unsubstantiated opinion": "Strikethroughs have no place in an article." Umm do you imagine yourself to be a higher authority that the bureaucrat who wrote this guideline? Just my 2c. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:08, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||