174
edits
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::::::You shouldn't edit other people's user pages for the same reason you shouldn't start rearranging someone's living room when they invite you in their house. It's not "Wikipedia does it this way, so we must do it the same way too", it's common courtesy. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:14, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::You shouldn't edit other people's user pages for the same reason you shouldn't start rearranging someone's living room when they invite you in their house. It's not "Wikipedia does it this way, so we must do it the same way too", it's common courtesy. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:14, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::I gotcha. But we all buddies here you know. You guys know how to fix a little thing, if it's your living room or wiki or whatever. We may be able to write whatever policy we want. (I'm including you when I say "we".) Why not regard user pages just like the wiki articles? That they are to describe the person in the "perception of consensus"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:24, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::I gotcha. But we all buddies here you know. You guys know how to fix a little thing, if it's your living room or wiki or whatever. We may be able to write whatever policy we want. (I'm including you when I say "we".) Why not regard user pages just like the wiki articles? That they are to describe the person in the "perception of consensus"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:24, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::(ec) If "we" are going to make policy (which I don't think we should - are "we" taking over this wiki now?), I would oppose such a move. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 07:38, 4 September 2009 (EDT) |
edits