1,136
edits
Lumenos
Joined 30 July 2009
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Lately I've been trying to establish some consensus on clear [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] here at WikiIndex. I'm not a sysop and have no special powers here other than "reason". | Lately I've been trying to establish some consensus on clear [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] here at WikiIndex. I'm not a sysop and have no special powers here other than "reason". | ||
I am | I am a sysop at a few wikis, including [[Lumeniki]] and [[RationalWiki]], although I have to admit the latter is just a bit of a misnomer. I would have gone with maybe "PassionateWiki" or perhaps [http://wikisynergy.com/wiki/Talk:Extraordinary_claims_require_extraordinary_evidence/is_abiogenesis_extraordinary#Why_has_abiogenesis_not_been_performed_in_a_laboratory.3F EmphaticWiki], but that's just me. :-) (By the way, a very active bureaucrat from RationalWiki wants you to know that, ""RationalWiki has about 3,197 registered users, of which 359 (or 11.23%) have Sysops rights, which are '''awarded very liberally by the bureaucrats.'''" from [[RationalWiki]] [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:07, 4 September 2009 (EDT)" I (Lumenos) tried to let them edit my user page here but apparently I am not able to lower the moral force field, protecting it. However | ||
[[User_talk:Lumenos#Reordering_talk_page_comments|I received permission to quote this particular bureaucrat]] and for that I am grateful. It might also be worth noting that the site [[Talk:RationalWiki#Notification_of_the_service_failure|became unavailable]] a few days after my arrival. A coincidence? Perhaps.) | |||
[[Lumeniki]] gets a little more in-depth on the serious subjects. Here is [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Lumenos my user page at Lumeniki]. | [[Lumeniki]] gets a little more in-depth on the serious subjects. Here is [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/User:Lumenos my user page at Lumeniki]. | ||