Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Line 411: Line 411:
:Say someone looks at the article, but they don't read the whole thing. Instead they click a link and find the site is not available. Then they figure WikiIndex isn't up to date. This is the situation I am trying to avoid. Why do you keep moving the notification down and changing it to a claim that is controversial and unverified? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:58, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
:Say someone looks at the article, but they don't read the whole thing. Instead they click a link and find the site is not available. Then they figure WikiIndex isn't up to date. This is the situation I am trying to avoid. Why do you keep moving the notification down and changing it to a claim that is controversial and unverified? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:58, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
::"Then they figure WikiIndex isn't up to date." Then the next step would instead be to read the entire article perhaps? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 06:21, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
::"Then they figure WikiIndex isn't up to date." Then the next step would instead be to read the entire article perhaps? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 06:21, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Why read an article about a site that isn't functioning? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 09:57, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits