1,136
edits
User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
My "agenda" part 2 (this time it's scienticlish)
No edit summary |
(My "agenda" part 2 (this time it's scienticlish)) |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
:::::No. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:01, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::No. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:01, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::: :-) | :::::: :-) | ||
== My "agenda" part 2 (this time it's scienticlish) == | |||
[The italicized part was moved from a location which shall remain unnamed by all who are not goblins] | |||
:''I can see how it can be difficult to [[User_talk:Nx|produce an "unbiased" article]] without blocking, when some editors are online more than others. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:28, 4 September 2009 (EDT)'' | |||
::''It's also hard to keep pushing your petty little agendas without blocking. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 10:37, 4 September 2009 (EDT)'' | |||
:I want to know my agenda! Are any of the following my "agendas" that you are referring to. These all relate to the [[RationalWiki]] article: | |||
* Put the notice of the service outage and the top of the page. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:20, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
* Change it from saying "temporary..." to simply "service outage" (with a note right after that of when we were apparently told it was going to be back in service). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:20, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
* Put a link to a debate regarding whether Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki. Nx you were doing so well in this debate, you must be doing this to make the [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:20, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||