1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 12:16, 6 September 2009
, 6 September 2009→Nx's example of RationalWiki's consensus
| Line 332: | Line 332: | ||
:::::::::::::::I do not understand why it even has to be in the article. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 17:46, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::I do not understand why it even has to be in the article. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 17:46, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::Dude, are you sitting down, cause I'm gonna blow your mind right now. This ''is'' the article!!!....er wait okay no, perhaps this particular example is not notable as to the itty bitty articles y'all prefer to make, but it was more of a uhhh proof of concept. Maybe later I will find a better example. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:31, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::::::::::Dude, are you sitting down, cause I'm gonna blow your mind right now. This ''is'' the article!!!....er wait okay no, perhaps this particular example is not notable as to the itty bitty articles y'all prefer to make, but it was more of a uhhh proof of concept. Maybe later I will find a better example. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:31, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::::Okay I just wanna nip this in the butt. Before anybody says, "Oh my Gosh! Lumenos is a prophet! Or ey must have been in on the whole thing! Let me assure you this is uuh as far as '''I''' know, just a coincidence. 08:16, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Criticism and rebuttals == | == Criticism and rebuttals == | ||