1,136
edits
m (→Enforcement against editors: woop one more spilling eror) |
(→Enforcement against editors: moved questions, etc to area about "protecting pages") |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
::* Warning tags are too strong - I like the idea of tags and think they should point to constructive information. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ::* Warning tags are too strong - I like the idea of tags and think they should point to constructive information. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:::* I agree. ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | :::* I agree. ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | ||
:::* Err um ([[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|then Dilley moved a few wikis to their talk pages without so much as a warning tag on them]]). | :::* Err um ([[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|then Dilley moved a few wikis to their talk pages without so much as a warning tag on them]]). (See "Protect page", then, "Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page and locking the article".) | ||
:* '''Relocate:''' | :* '''Relocate:''' | ||
::* See "Protect page", then, "Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page and locking the article". | ::* See "Protect page", then, "Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page and locking the article". | ||
Line 82: | Line 76: | ||
:* '''Protect page:''' | :* '''Protect page:''' | ||
::*'''Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page and locking the article:''' Apparently the rule is/was, "[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki&diff=70872&oldid=70839 Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:19, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::*'''Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page and locking the article:''' Apparently the rule is/was, "[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki&diff=70872&oldid=70839 Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:19, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::*([[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|Dilley moved a few wikis to their talk pages without so much as a warning tag on them]]). Cap'n, perhaps it is not my place to know, but is there any way of predicting which way this ship is going, before we get there? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:13, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::*He did [[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|warn/suggest this to editors]] but I didn't come across any instructions for how editors may have avoided this or when/why it was going to happen. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:10, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::*He has now given us a way of ''predicting'' when he might do this (see above). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::*But now some questions are: | |||
:::::What is the purpose of doing this? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::::How can editors avoid this happening, in the future? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::::What do editors have to do, in order to have the article pages unprotected? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:* '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost. | :* '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost. | ||
:* '''Block editor:''' See [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy]]. | :* '''Block editor:''' See [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy]]. |
edits