174
edits
(→removing talk page comments: flawed argument) |
|||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
:::::Seriously, this censorship thing is becoming WikiIndex's Godwin. Please drop the loaded language. The wikis have nothing to do with RationalWiki. Categories are meant to group similar wikis together. The wikis are in the appropriate categories. No information is being censored. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 04:27, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::Seriously, this censorship thing is becoming WikiIndex's Godwin. Please drop the loaded language. The wikis have nothing to do with RationalWiki. Categories are meant to group similar wikis together. The wikis are in the appropriate categories. No information is being censored. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 04:27, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::I suppose it possible that you believe these bizarre rationalizations. Those wikis have the same subject matter. I've got quite a lot of work to do to fix the latest mess we have made on the talk page. If you'll excuse me. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::I suppose it possible that you believe these bizarre rationalizations. Those wikis have the same subject matter. I've got quite a lot of work to do to fix the latest mess we have made on the talk page. If you'll excuse me. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::If they have the same subject matter, then they should be in the same category. That said, RationalWiki does not have one single subject matter - Conservapedia is still an important subject, and as far as I know, that is not the subject of those other wikis. [[User:Nx|Nx]] |
edits