174
edits
(→removing talk page comments: flawed argument) |
(→removing talk page comments: archives) |
||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
::::::I suppose it possible that you believe these bizarre rationalizations. Those wikis have the same subject matter. I've got quite a lot of work to do to fix the latest mess we have made on the talk page. If you'll excuse me. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::I suppose it possible that you believe these bizarre rationalizations. Those wikis have the same subject matter. I've got quite a lot of work to do to fix the latest mess we have made on the talk page. If you'll excuse me. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::If they have the same subject matter, then they should be in the same category. That said, RationalWiki does not have one single subject matter - Conservapedia is still an important subject, and as far as I know, that is not the subject of those other wikis. [[User:Nx|Nx]] | :::::::If they have the same subject matter, then they should be in the same category. That said, RationalWiki does not have one single subject matter - Conservapedia is still an important subject, and as far as I know, that is not the subject of those other wikis. [[User:Nx|Nx]] | ||
Also please learn what archives are for. If someone wants to continue a discussion there (I doubt it), they can bring it up on the talk page again and link to the previous discussion in the archive. Having to places to discuss things is NOT a good idea. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 05:32, 10 September 2009 (EDT) |
edits