146
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 23:41, 10 September 2009
, 10 September 2009→Move to article page - vote
mNo edit summary |
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 524: | Line 524: | ||
As I find this discussion page a little incomprehensible and as the statement at the top says: ''Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 [[Sysops]] and 3 people involved'' I propose that we do just that.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | As I find this discussion page a little incomprehensible and as the statement at the top says: ''Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 [[Sysops]] and 3 people involved'' I propose that we do just that.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Personally I'd rather not, unless critical views are going to be linked to, in the article. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:56, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :Personally I'd rather not, unless critical views are going to be linked to, in the article. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:56, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::I second BobM. There is no consideration given to "nay" votes in the line at the top, btw. Good luck ''finding'' 3 sysops, though. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Vote for re-insertion== | ==Vote for re-insertion== | ||
--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||