146
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 23:42, 10 September 2009
, 10 September 2009→Vote for re-insertion
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 529: | Line 529: | ||
--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Whatever your idea of a "debate map" means (can I have a link to what you mean?), all I see is you mucking up others' comments where ever you feel like it. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:42, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | |||