60
edits
Line 527: | Line 527: | ||
:Personally I'd rather not, unless critical views are going to be linked to, in the article. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:56, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :Personally I'd rather not, unless critical views are going to be linked to, in the article. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:56, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::I second BobM. There is no consideration given to "nay" votes in the line at the top, btw. Good luck ''finding'' 3 sysops, though. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::I second BobM. There is no consideration given to "nay" votes in the line at the top, btw. Good luck ''finding'' 3 sysops, though. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::I must admit that I felt that the "three sysops" objective was setting the bar rather high. Possibly we need to propose some more sysops.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 06:55, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Vote for re-insertion== | ==Vote for re-insertion== |
edits